The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Plan multi-agency investigations
|
|
Determine external agencies relevant to investigations to inform planning Completed |
Evidence:
|
Negotiate with external agencies and stakeholders to determine scope, direction, capabilities and roles within investigations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine investigation objectives and scope to maintain operational focus |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop investigation plans with identified objectives, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Confirm inter-agency agreements to formalise communication channels and promote shared understanding |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Address cross-agency enquiries to facilitate coordination |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan multi-agency budget and resource allocation
|
|
Determine, document and budget for resources required for planning purposes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify access strategies to obtain resources available from external agencies |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Negotiate with decision makers to access workforce and deployment resources |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop resource management plan to guide multi-agency investigations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Coordinate multi-agencies in crime investigations
|
|
Formalise communication channels between agencies to facilitate flow of information during investigation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Formalise command structures, roles and areas of responsibility to facilitate control and coordination of investigations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement strategies to ensure consistent approaches during investigations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Inform agencies of their roles, responsibilities and required outcomes to achieve investigative objectives |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Manage inter-agency conflicts to achieve investigative objectives |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review resource allocations and usage to maximise benefits and agency accountability |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor expenditure and resource usage throughout investigations to maximise investigative objectives |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement operational security requirements
|
|
Assess and review risks regularly to protect individuals, own organisation and external agencies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine organisational security requirements for planning purposes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement security arrangements to protect multi-agency interests and assets |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and adjust security arrangements in accordance with changing circumstances and requirements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review multi-agency investigations
|
|
Evaluate inter-agency agreements to identify areas of improvement Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assess outcomes of multi-agency investigations to determine effectiveness |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate flow of information to identify impacting factors |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify performance challenges to improve future multi-agency investigations |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document and communicate review findings to stakeholders in accordance with multi-agency protocols and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|